选择供应商的工具

选择供应商的工具

‎ ‎ SELECTION TOOL 选择供应商的工具 SUPPLIER INFORMATION 供应商信息：‎ Supplier name: ‎ 供应商名称：‎ Phone: ‎ 电话：‎ Fax: ‎ 传真：‎ Corporate headquarters address: ‎ 总部地址：‎ Supplier web page address: ‎ 网址：‎ Contact name/title: ‎ 联系人：‎ Phone: ‎ 电话：‎ Fax: ‎ 传真：‎ Contact address: ‎ 联系地址：‎ Contact email: ‎ EMAIL：‎ Other important information: ‎ 其他重要信息：‎ SQE ANALYSIS SQE分析：‎ Weight 比重 Supplier A 供应商A Supplier B 供应商B Supplier C 供应商C RTS Readiness Supplier’s Outgoing Quality Level/DPPM ‎]供应商出货品质水平/DPPM Supplier’s Customers Line Reject Rate 供应商客户的厂内不良率：‎ Supplier’s Customers Field Reject Rate 供应商客户的市场不良率：‎ Forecasted LRR @ Customer 预估的客户产线不良率 ‎ 7‎ ‎ ‎ Forecasted IFIR @ Customer CUSTOMER的预期初始市场不良率 Quality System 品质系统：‎ Quality Resources 品质资源：‎ TOTAL (weighted)‎ 总计 ‎100%‎ ‎ 7‎ ‎ ‎ SQE WORKSHEET SQE工作表：‎ RTS READINESS SCORE: ‎ ‎ 分数：‎ Detail: How soon may the product be successfully introduced into Customer manufacturing, and does the compatibility of the design meet Customer’s needs?‎ 说明： 产品需要多长时间才能成功导入CUSTOMER生产，设计能力是否可以满足CUSTOMER需求？‎ Scoring: 1 Represents high risk to schedule and quality OR not compatible 分数： 时间及品质具有高风险性，配合度差 2 Represents medium risk to schedule or quality; compatible 时间及品质具有中等风险性，配合度好 3 Represents low risk to schedule or quality; compatible 时间及品质具有低风险性，配合度好 4 No risk to schedule or quality; compatible 时间及品质无风险性，配合度好 Comments备注: ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ SUPPLIER’S OUTGOING QUALITY LEVEL/DPPM SCORE: ‎ 供应商出货品质等级/DPPM Detail: (Supplier’s history) ‎ 说明 供应商的历史状况 ‎ Supplier should be measuring DPPM rates, analyzing/categorizing reasons for failures, and taking appropriate corrective actions.‎ ‎ 供应商能够计算出不良率，分析失效原因并加以分类，并能够剔除有效的改善对策。‎ Scoring: 1 Supplier does not measure DPPM rate 分数： 供应商无法计算出不良率 2 Supplier measures DPPM rate, however, there is no analysis (pareto) or corrective action 供应商能够计算出不良率，但无法提供分析及改善对策。‎ 3 Supplier measures DPPM rate and performs analysis (pareto), however, no corrective action is taken 供应商能够计算出不良率，能够剔除原因分析，但是无法提供改善对策。‎ 4 Supplier measures DPPM rate, performs analysis (pareto) and has effective corrective ‎ 7‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ action system 供应商能够计算出不良率，提供原因分析及有效的改善对策。‎ ‎ GENERAL DPPM INFORMATION:‎ ‎ 主要的市场不良资讯：‎ ‎ a) Agree to Customer’s DPPM goals: o Yes, goals are _______ o No ‎ 是否达到CUSTOMER不良率目标： o是，目标是： o否 ‎ b) Plan to support achievement of DPPM goals: o Yes (plan attached)‎ ‎ o Plan promised by _____________‎ ‎ 是否有确保达到不良率目标的计划： o是（相关计划）‎ ‎ o 计划确定人：‎ Comments备注: ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ SUPPLIER’S CUSTOMERS’ LINE REJECT RATES SCORE ‎ 供应商客户的厂内不良率 分数：‎ Detail: (Supplier’s customers’ history)______________ (Customer’s current goal) ‎ 说明： （供应商的历史状况） CUSTOMER 的现行目标 Scoring: 1 Supplier’s customers’ LRR is 2 times worse than Customer’s current goal 分数： 供应商客户的长期不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标值的2倍 2 Supplier’s customers’ LRR is greater than Customer’s current goal, yet less than 2 times greater 供应商客户的长期不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标值，但是小于其2倍 3 Supplier’s customers’ LRR is approximately equal to Customer’s current goal 供应商客户的长期不良率基本与CUSTOMER现行目标一致 4 Supplier’s customers’ LRR is better than Customer’s current goal 供应商客户的长期不良率优于CUSTOMER现行目标值 ‎ 7‎ ‎ ‎ SUPPLIER’S CUSTOMERS’ FIELD REJECT RATES SCORE: ‎ 供应商客户的市场不良率 分数：‎ Detail: (Supplier’s customers’ history)______________ (Customer’s current goal) ‎ 说明： 供应商客户的历史状况 CUSTOMER现行目标 Scoring: 1 Supplier’s customers’ FIR is 2 times worse than Customer’s current goal 分数： 供应商客户的市场不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标值的2倍 2 Supplier’s customers’ FIR is greater than Customer’s current goal, yet less than 2 times greater CUSTOMER客户的市场不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标，但低于其2倍 3 Supplier’s customers’ FIR is approximately equal to Customer’s current goal 供应商客户的市场不良率基本与CUSTOMER现行目标值一致 4 Supplier’s customers’ FIR is better than Customer’s current goal 供应商客户的市场不良率优于CUSTOMER现行目标值 FORECASTED LRR @ CUSTOMER SCORE: ‎ 预期的CUSTOMER产线不良率 分数——‎ DETAIL: (SUPPLIER’S FORECASTED)_____________________ (CUSTOMER’S CURRENT GOAL) ‎ 说明： 供应商的预估值 CUSTOMER的现行目标 Scoring: 1 Supplier’s LRR is 2 times worse than Customer’s current goal 分数： 供应商的产线不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标值的2倍 2 Supplier’s LRR is greater than Customer’s current goal, yet less than 2 times greater 供应商的产线不良率超过CUSTOMER的现行目标值，但低于其2倍 3 Supplier’s LRR is approximately equal to Customer’s current goal 供应商的产线不良率基本与CUSTOMER现行目标值一致 4 Supplier’s LRR is better than Customer’s current goal 供应商的产线不良率优于CUSTOMER现行目标值 FORECASTED IFIR @ CUSTOMER SCORE: ‎ 预期的CUSTOMER早期市场不良率 分数 Detail: (Supplier’s forecasted)_____________________ (Customer’s current goal) ‎ 说明： 供应商的预估值 CUSTOMER的现行目标值 ‎ 7‎ ‎ ‎ Scoring: 1 Supplier’s IFIR is 2 times worse than Customer’s current goal 分数 供应商的早期市场不良率超过CUSTOMER现行目标值的2倍 2 Supplier’s IFIR is greater than Customer’s current goal, yet less than 2 times greater 供应商的早期市场不良率超过CUSTOMER的现行目标值，但低于其2倍 3 Supplier’s IFIR is approximately equal to Customer’s current goal 供应商的早期市场不良率基本于CUSTOMER现行目标值一致 4 Supplier’s IFIR is better than Customer’s current goal 供应商的早期市场不良率优于CUSTOMER现行目标 QUALITY SYSTEM SCORE: ‎ 品质系统 分数 Detail细则:‎ a) ISO Certification: 1 Yes (circle one: 9001 9002) 0 No a) ISO认证 ‎ b) Customer Quality Systems Audit scoring ranges:‎ b) 品质系统稽核得分 ‎ 0 Less than 70% (Not Approved)‎ ‎ 2 Between 70–89% (Conditionally Approved)‎ ‎ 4 Between 90–100% (Approved)‎ QUALITY RESOURCES SCORE: ‎ 品质资源 分数 ‎ Detail细则:‎ ‎ The Supplier should have a dedicated Quality Department with adequate staffing resources to attend to tactical issues and a Quality Manager with time to attend to strategic issues. Additionally, Supplier should be willing to appoint a Joint Quality Engineer for each mfg site.‎ ‎ 供应商应当建立专门的品保系统、足够的品保员工参与品质问题的解决，任命品保经理参与公司决策，另外供应商还要在每个制造厂任命一名JQE Scoring: 1 Inadequate resources ‎ 系统不健全 2 Quality staff; however, no Quality Manager 有品保员工，但没有专职品保经理 3 Quality Department and dedicated Quality Manager 有品保员工和专职品保经理 4 Quality Department, Quality Manager, and willing to appoint a JQE 有品保员工和专职品保经理，同意任命一名JQE ‎ 7‎ ‎ ‎ LOCAL SUPPORT支持 SCORE: ‎ Detail: Supplier capability to meet Customer’s “Supplier Quality Standard”‎ 细则： 供应商目前的状况可以满足客户的“SQS”‎ Scoring: 1 No commitment to support and won’t be ready until 3 months after First Customer Ship ‎ 第一次客户调查没有达到要求且3个月内都没有完成客户的要求 2 Exists but poor execution, or won’t be ready until 1 month after FCS ‎ 3 客户的要求已经改正但改善效果不好，且客户调查后一个月内都没有达成相关要求 4 Exists but not totally meeting expectations, or Supplier can have in place at FCS 基本已经满足客户要求或客户调查时能够及时改善 5 Already exists and meeting expectations 完全满足客户要求 ‎ 7‎